ABOUT US

NLF Mission Statement • NLF Board • NLF Staff • FAQ • Donor Correspondence

 

Seize the Day!
Making a Difference
Protecting our Christian Heritage
2004 in Review
Still Protecting the Ten Commandments
Let's Stop Planned Parenthood
Let's Protect the Ten Commandments
Enough is Enough!
Let's Stand Up to the Radical Elite!
Looking Forward to 2004
2003 in Review
Marriage Still Matters!
Marriage Matters!
Pledge of Allegiance
See You at the Pole
Be strong and courageous!
We must keep defending the rights of belivers
Letís stop discrimination against Christians
Marriage is Sacred. Let's Defend it!
America IS One Nation Under God!
Looking Forward to 2003
2002 in Review
Stand Up for Right
Don't Let Them Shut Us Up
Libraries Should be Safe for Children
Marriage and the Family
Let's Stop the ACLU
Pledge of Allegiance
Parental Rights
Gay Adoption
Graduation Prayer
Burns Verdict
Looking Forward to 2002
2001 in Review
Ten Commandments Update
Defending the Traditional Family
The Battle for the Ten Commandments
9.11.01
See You at the Pole
Joshua Miller
The Battle Against Homosexual Marriage
The Battle Against Internet Child Pornography
Looking Forward to 2001
2000 in Review
Bible Clubs in California
Adler v. Duval County School Board
Prayer in Schools
Reverend Patrick Mahoney
Ohio Motto
RSVP and the Ten Commandments
Looking Forward to 2000

 

April 5, 2001

Office of the President
Steven W. Fitschen

It’s unbelievable! Pornographers will actually argue at the United States Supreme Court that laws against internet CHILD pornography are unconstitutional. Help us defeat them!

Dear Friend of the National Legal Foundation:

Some things are beyond belief!

The United States Congress passed a law to try to put a dent in the traffic in the vilest of internet pornography . . . child pornography.

How could anybody be against such a thing? Well, the pornographers are!

How can such madness be happening in America today?

PLEASE READ THE NEXT FEW PARAGRAPHS CAREFULLY. I WILL NOT DISCUSS THE GRAPHIC DETAILS OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. AND I WILL NOT DELVE TOO DEEPLY INTO THE LEGAL TECHNICALITIES. BUT I MUST GIVE YOU SOME DETAILS FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WE HAVE COME TO IN THIS COUNTRY.

It all hinges on an earlier Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld a New York statute that prohibited child porn. That case, called Ferber v. New York, was decided before some of the latest computer technology was available. Therefore, in those days the Court was very concerned about the impact on the children that were used in the making of the pornography. AND RIGHTLY SO!

The Court was concerned about the harm to the children both from the horrifying experience of being involved in the production of the pornography and from the fact that the children would be able to be recognized in the pictures in the future.

So far, so good.

But now comes the really ridiculous part. The child pornographers to this case and turned it to their own advantage. They actually argued that because they can now alter photographic and video images, they can change the children’s faces so that — according to them — there is no harm from being recognized. And they also argue that they can make "virtual" child pornography. In other words, they can make images that are so realistic — like the images in the fanciest video games — that sometimes they don’t even need real children so there is to real children in these cases — again, according to them!

Therefore, according to the pornographers, Congress’s law must be unconstitutional.

Well, as you can imagine, most courts that have heard this argument have utterly rejected it. Some judges have said that they can consider other harms. Especially the fact that those who use child pornography will often sexually abuse children. Other judges have wisely said, we don’t even have to do any fancy analysis about different harms because this filth has no constitutional protection whatsoever!

BUT . . . the pornographers convinced the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals — probably the most liberal federal court in the county — to agree with their silly arguments.

Now the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case and decide the issue once and for all!

We have been working with President Bush’s Justice Department to support them in this case. As you know, the Justice Department is under the direction of Attorney General John Ashcroft. I’m sure many of you prayed for John during his confirmation hearings.

Now you have an opportunity to support him in court . . . by helping us have the financial resources to file our important brief. A brief that will help John and help protect America’s children from the scourge of child pornography.

We must stop the traffic in this vile filth. Please be part of the team!

For the Children,

Steven W. Fitschen
President

P.S. Please respond as quickly as possible. The brief is due in just days.

Some ministries would have subjected you to the graphic details of the horrors of child pornography. The reason, of course, is because they think people will give more when they are confronted with the hideous suffering of the children. But I didn’t want to do that to you. You already know that none of work gets done without you. It is only because of your prayers and your financial gifts that we can do any of our work.

Therefore, I know that I do not have to use shock techniques in order for you and all of our other friends to pray about supporting us in this effort . . . and that is good enough for me. Please give as the Lord leads.

 
 

 

 


Post Office Box 64427, Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23467-4427
Phone (757) 463.6133; Fax (757) 463.6055; E-mail
nlf@nlf.net

© 2006 by the National Legal Foundation & Minuteman Institute